Home

hickories 001

When I think of the word “wilderness,” I think of a part of nature that is completely secluded from mankind; a place where a person can go to truly connect with nature and be free with their internal thoughts. It is safe to say that in today’s world, the word “wilderness” is associated with very positive thoughts and descriptions. but, this has not always been the case. This claim is put to the test in William Cronon’s, “The Trouble with Wilderness.” In fact, in this piece of writing, Cronon explains that in early history, the wilderness had many negative associations.
” As late as the eighteenth century, the most common usage of the word “wilderness” in the English language referred to landscapes that generally carried adjectives far different from the ones they attract today. To be a wilderness then was to be “deserted,” “savage,” “desolate,” “barren”—in short, a “waste,” the word’s nearest synonym. Its connotations were anything but positive, and the emotion one was most likely to feel in its presence was “bewilderment” or terror” (Cronon).
This direct quote from “The Trouble with Wilderness,” does a great job of showing exactly how the current thoughts of the wilderness are completely different and almost contradict what the thoughts were many, many years ago. This quote also shows how much wilderness and its history go hand in hand with each other. As history changed throughout the years, so did the thoughts and descriptions of the wilderness.
After reading this article by Cronon, my eyes really opened as to how wilderness first started out as a really negative thought and then changed. I would describe the historical definitions of the wilderness as a constant changing idea. As humans grew and developed  into what we are today, so did the thoughts on history. As Cronon described in Biblical times, wilderness was a waste and it was dangerous. People really did not understand what the point of having some sort wilderness was. As the years went on though, many people began to embrace the wilderness and developed different, more positive, thoughts on wilderness. I think the constant association with change and our history and wilderness is what really describes their relationship together.
Overall, Cronon’s piece of writing is a real eye opener to how the wilderness never really started out as anything positive; it had to develop many years through the thought of people to get the reputation that it has today. When Cronon describes the history of wilderness itself , he really creates a strong argument stating that most people now did not have any prior knowledge of what wilderness really was to our past ancestors. I think that this article will catch many people off guard and really open their eyes to the changes of the word “wilderness” throughout the years and help them learn that history and nature can really go hand and hand with each other.

Works Cited
William Cronon, ed., Uncommon Ground: Rethinking the Human Place in Nature, New York: W. W. Norton & Co., 1995, 69-90

Advertisements

6 thoughts on “The History of “Wilderness”

  1. I like your recount of wilderness through the ages. Cronon’s description of wilderness seems a bit negative compared to how most of the public views it today, but perhaps he is right. We isolated ourselves from it at a point for a reason, so his argument seems plausible.

  2. I think a lot of people react negatively to Cronon’s argument because they enjoy their romantic view of nature and “wilderness.” As Cronon points out, wilderness is a construct — as humans we create certain areas to be “civilization” and label what is outside of those areas, “wilderness.” How we feel about wilderness — whether we like it, fear it, enjoy it, think it’s evil, etc. — has changed over the centuries. We’re in kind of a romantic phase in which we want to preserve our wilderness spaces. There’s two problems with that: 1) “If the nature of ecosystems is to change, why are we putting in effort to maintain something if it isn’t natural for it to be stagnant?”, and 2) “What about all those places that are not officially “wilderness,” but are closer to where we live, have more impact on our own air, water, and soil quality, and which are much more likely to suffer impacts from us?” By romanticizing wilderness, we pull attention away from places where we are both impacted and impacting.

    • I completely agree with Mrs. Roy. We think of wilderness as somewhere that humans are not a part of and view it to be away from civilization even though wilderness is all around us. This causes problems because people don’t realize that things they do can harm the planet from something big like a rain forest to something small like their backyard.

  3. I like the way the wilderness is described in the beginning. I find it very interesting about the Cronon and the way he goes about the wilderness and whether we like it, fear it, enjoy it or think that it is evil. The way that this article is described makes me want to read it as well.

  4. I like how wilderness was described at the beginning of the article also. I would also describe it similarly. The description of Cronon’s view on wilderness and the authors was set up. Its crazy how the definition of wilderness has changed throughout the years,

  5. I agree on your thoughts of wilderness.Today wilderness is seen as an escape, a place where anyone could go to clear their mind completely. I like the vast difference between your thoughts and the thoughts from the eighteenth century, that it was scary. I think that fact alone shows how the world has changed and also how people’s outlook has changed over the years.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s